Exploring the Attitudes of the Violence Knowledge Levels
Among the Different Branch Teachers
Accepted 24th
July, 2020
Veysel Temel, Kazım Nas and Mehmet Dalkılıç
Karamanoglu Mehmetbey University, Physical
Education And Sports High School, Turkey.
Violence is a common public problem in the
society. Furthermore, the aggressive and violent
behaviors of adolescents have negative impacts
on the society. Exposure to violence has been
shown to negatively affect successs, motivation
and mental health. The goal of the study was to
describe the attitudes to the violence in a
sample of Turkish different branches teachers.
Three types of attitudes were assessed: Crime
and war, corporal punishment and partner
violence. Data were obtained from 149 Turkish
different branch teachers. To measure the
attitude of different branches teachers’ towards
to violence a 17 item likert scale developed by
Davidson ve Canivez (2012) and adapted into
Turkish by Akın et al. (2016) was used. The
skewness and kurtosis normality distribution
test was used to determine whether the
measurements are suitable for normality. As a
result, t-test and One way - Anova tests were
applied bacause of the normal distribution in
all dimensions. And post hock sheff tests were
used to determine the source of the difference.
In conclusion, general attitudes of the teachers
towards violence and crime and war scores were
about mid level, corporal punishment scores and
partner violence were significantly lower. The
results highlight the importance of research on
violence attitudes to assess gender differences.
So men have higher attitudes to the violence
than the women.
Key words: Attitude, violence, teachers.
This is an open access article
published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution
License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and
reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is
properly cited.
Cite this article as:
Temel V, Nas K, Dalkiliç M (2020). Exploring the Attitudes of the Volence
Knowledge Levels Among the Different Branch Teachers. Acad. J. Sci. Res.
8(10): 333-341.